"What is the future of television?"
Currently, there are two main paths: OLED and quantum dot technology. This situation is very similar to that of plasma TVs in the past.So, the next question arises: "Which one, OLED or quantum dots, is more likely to shape the future of color TV?"
In general, both OLED and quantum dot technologies are evenly matched. The OLED camp has many companies but lacks a dominant player like Samsung in the LCD market. On the other hand, the quantum dot camp has strong industry leaders but fewer participants. Each has its own strengths.Looking ahead, OLED and quantum dots will continue to compete for the next three years. It's unlikely that one will completely dominate the other, just as it was hard for LCDs and plasmas to eliminate each other.
From my personal experience, I lean more toward OLED. My reasoning is simple: QD TVs are still based on LCD technology, which isn't a major technological breakthrough. In contrast, OLED represents a new and revolutionary display technology. From a broader perspective, OLED has greater potential for innovation and long-term impact.
There may be electroluminescent QLED TVs in the next 2-3 years, but they're still futuristic concepts.
The significance of OLED isn’t just about high contrast or better screen performance. While OLED offers excellent image quality, quantum dot TVs are also impressive. The key difference lies in the unique flexibility of OLED displays.
Flexible display has two meanings: first, OLED can be curved and used on non-flat surfaces. Second, it can be folded or rolled. These features are not available with LCDs or current quantum dot TVs. Although future QLEDs may become flexible, they are not yet here.
I believe the greatest value of OLED lies in its flexibility, as it paves the way for the era of “display everywhere.â€
OLED’s flexible properties have already started to influence product design. We’ve seen wallpaper TVs, curved S-shaped TVs, dual-sided TVs, transparent TVs, and even sound-field TVs. The future promises even more creative designs.
OLED TVs that can roll up or fold away are expected soon.
Consumers often react positively to OLED TVs. Many are amazed by their slim design and stunning picture quality. This is a natural reaction from the brain when comparing OLED and LCD technologies.
"Natural quality is hard to give up," and OLED TVs are well-known globally. However, some negative news about OLEDs focuses on two issues: "burn-in" (or "ghost image") and "short lifespan." Despite explanations from manufacturers, many consumers still have doubts.
What is the truth? Over the past decade, I've written extensively about OLED technology, starting around 2004, when it was still in the lab stage. Most of my articles were based on industry trends and technical characteristics, rather than actual products.
I am an actual user of OLED TVs. I purchased my first OLED TV in October 2016, and it has been over a year since then. I mention this because I was initially cautious, just like most consumers. I worried about whether OLED TVs were mature enough and if I would regret the purchase, especially considering their higher price compared to LCD TVs.
I’m a rational and conservative consumer. I waited until 2016 to buy OLED TVs because I believed the technology had reached a mature stage. Sony also entered the OLED market in early 2017, launching the A1 model, which suggests that OLED technology was ready for mass adoption.
Now, you might wonder about my real-life experience with OLED TVs. Let me share: aside from excellent design and picture quality, I haven’t encountered any problems like "ghosting."
I have two TVs at home: a domestic 55-inch 4K HDR OLED and a foreign 60-inch 4K HDR LCD. Both are high-end models, and I use them roughly equally. I mainly watch documentaries, news, and occasional shows. I don’t spend too much time on TV, but I do find the OLED experience superior in terms of clarity and depth.
Before buying OLED, I was concerned about "burn-in" and "short lifespan," just like others. I even discussed this with an executive from a Chinese OLED company in 2015. At that time, I asked whether OLED TVs were mature enough to be safe to buy.
Meanwhile, the anti-OLED side claimed, "Don’t use consumers as test subjects." But after using my OLED TV for over a year, I never saw any signs of burn-in. Even when I left a static image on the screen for 24 hours, there was no trace of ghosting.
Today, I believe the issue of "ghost image" is largely a myth. Early OLED TVs may have had some issues, but modern ones have solved this problem. Those who keep bringing it up are like pointing at someone’s clothes and shouting, "Your grandfather was a thief."
As for the "short lifespan" of OLED TVs, I don’t think it’s a big concern. Mainstream OLED companies claim a 50,000-hour lifespan, which translates to about 13.7 years if used 10 hours daily. That’s well beyond the typical 8-year lifespan required by the state. So, OLED TVs are not short-lived—they’re actually quite durable.
The term "organic" may contribute to the misconception that OLED TVs are fragile. But just because something is organic doesn’t mean it can’t last. After all, trees grow for decades, and fruits can stay fresh for weeks. Similarly, OLED TVs are designed to last a long time.
In conclusion, OLED TVs are a promising technology with real-world benefits. While there are challenges, such as supply chain issues, the overall outlook is positive. Sony’s entry into the OLED market is a strong endorsement of its maturity and potential.
For more smart TV and box information, visit Smart TV/box information network sofa butler (http://), China's influential TV box and smart TV website, providing updates, communication, and insights on smart TVs, TV boxes, and related software.Remote Monitor Systems Battery
Remote Monitor Systems Battery,E Cigarette Lithium Battery,Semi Tight Lithium Battery,Intelligent Oem Lithium Battery
Jiangmen Hongli Energy Co.ltd , https://www.honglienergy.com